Deacon Nick Donnelly: Who Can I Vote For?

Deacon Nick Donnelly of Protect the Pope offers some advice on who Catholics can vote for in the upcoming general election in a recent article which has been banned by a local paper because of its "political content". Deacon Nick explains:

The editor of the Barrow Evening Mail has banned my article on the General Election from their weekly Christian Comment section. He gave the following reason:

'It is highly politicised and as we are now in purdah (the period running up to an election during which newspapers must be extremely careful of what political content they publish), it is not appropriate for publication I'm afraid.'

Here's my banned article:

Every General Election I am faced with a dilemma as a Christian – which candidate and political party can I vote for in good conscience?

As a Christian I no longer trust the Labour party because of their actions against the Church when last in government. It was Tony Blair who destroyed the network of Catholic adoption agencies in this country by forcing them to place children with gay couples. As a consequence the Church had to cut her links with adoption agencies that ordinary Christians had built up over a hundred years.

How can I vote for a candidate who won’t protect babies from being aborted because they’re girls? Recently, the vast majority of Labour MPs, including Barrow’s John Woodcock, voted down legislation that would have ensured that babies are protected from sex-selection abortion.
I also can’t vote for the Liberal Democrats or Green party because they hold more extreme positions than Labour that are impossible for me to reconcile with my Christian Faith.

How can Christians trust David Cameron after his legalisation of same sex marriage which did not feature in either the 2010 manifesto or in the Coalition Agreement with the Liberal Democrats? And now Christian schools are being put into special measures by Ofsted for not adequately teaching LGBT rights and issues.

When it comes to the Conservative party I’m profoundly reluctant to vote for their candidate Simon Fell considering his party’s record on life issues and same-sex marriage. It was Margaret Thatcher’s government that legalised experimentation on embryonic human beings conceived through IVF. This original Tory legislation has led to the creation in the laboratory of animal-human hybrids and recent legalisation allowing the destruction of embryonic human beings as to be used as spare parts for siblings.

Some Christians tell me that they’re going to vote of UKIP as a protest vote but even that option is not open to me because of their policy of cutting the UK’s foreign aid budget by two-thirds. It would be gravely immoral to cut aid to some of the poorest and most vulnerable families and children in the world who depend on the UK for food, medicine and education.

I consider voting at a General Election to be a solemn and binding duty on every citizen because countless men and women have given their lives to protect our freedom as a democracy. But what do Christians do when all the political parties advocate a whole variety of policies that we consider immoral? I’m sure I’m not the only one to conclude that no political party at this General Election represents our moral world view as a Christians.

History tells us that new political movements emerge when groups of people find themselves politically marginalised or disenfranchised. Have we come to the point when Christians feel strongly enough to challenge the secular ruling establishment in this country?

Deacon Nick Donnelly, Our Lady of Furness, Duke St, Barrow.


  1. If that is a commentary that is disallowed during an election campaign, it is one more sign that England ceased to be a Christian country. Well done, Nick. You help make the picture clear for us.

  2. A good piece, but too close to reality for a secular newspaper, I suppose. I'm never sure whether voting is a duty, though: surely we have earned the right not to vote, as well as the right to vote? Either way, I am not sure what I shall do when the time comes - it's an election they all deserve to lose.

  3. A good article that, in my view, is politically balanced. Thank you Deacon Nick and Mark.

    That the article was considered unsuitable for publication by the editor of the Barrow Evening Mail is indicative of two malaises:

    Firstly, it exemplifies the decline of a once-vibrant regional and local press in this country. What remains bases most of its 'news' on press releases from local and national government, big businesses and tittle-tattle hawked around by press agencies.

    Secondly, and more worryingly, it illustrates the extent to which much of the media readily submit to the received wisdom of the contemporary Establishment viewpoint. We all know that a one-party state is not a democracy, but is Britain sleepwalking into a one-ideology state?

  4. Nick, I do not agree with everything that you write; but I agree 100% with this article. As Catholics we are between a rock and a hard place. I live in Bromley, Kent and my local MP Bob Neill is a Conservative. He has however voted against Gay Marriage, Against "3 person IVF" and has generally taken what might be considered a Catholic line when voting. But would a vote for Bob Neill as an MP be taken as vote of confidence in David Cameron?
    Personally I do not agree with many Conservative policies on Social Issues but the thought of the SNP in coalition with Labour fills me with dread.
    More thinking and prayer required.

  5. I am afraid I disagree with you over the foreign aid budget: it is one thing to help impoverished nations, quite another to give money to governments who are well capable of looking after their poor but choose not to (like India or China for instance).


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pope Francis: we planned it all before the conclave

Pope Francis: Dismantling Marriage

Establishing a New Object of Worship