The Potential New Head of the CDF
Speculation is growing that diminutive Maltese Archbishop Charles Scicluna is soon to be appointed prelate for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the oldest among the nine congregations of the Roman Curia.
Edward Pentin has provided an exhaustive analysis of this which you can read here. In it, Pentin details the positive things about Scicluna, but also how he seems to have changed dramatically under this papacy and has said and done some deeply problematic things.
Scicluna held positions in the Roman Curia from 1995 to 2012, when he was appointed Auxiliary Bishop of Malta. Both as a curial official and since becoming a bishop he has conducted investigations into sexual abuse by clergy on behalf of the Holy See and led a board that reviews such cases. He has been called "the Vatican's most respected sex crimes expert" by the Washington Post.Scicluna obtained a doctorate in canon law at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome in 1991. His thesis supervisor was Raymond Burke and he presented it to Professor Urbano Navarrete Cortés, SJ; both later became cardinals.
In 2015 he was appointed Archbishop of Malta, and I wrote this glowing appraisal with a follow up post here.
Many clerics and lay people I know have looked to Scicluna as a bit of a Catholic hero. Intelligent, courageous and a true son of the Church. His investigative work for the curia means he knows where certain bodies are buried. He has historically been considered as orthodox with no agenda other than standing for Christ and an individual who is not afraid to stand up for the marginalised and speak truth to power.
Then came the Francis Pontificate.
With Francis as Pope, Scicluna seemed to ditch his faith, knowledge and training and go all out to pursue high office. He has made a number of embarrassing errors.
The disastrous Maltese Guidelines saw a dreadful capitulation which appeared to be nothing more than the two Maltese bishops acting as tools for Pope Francis to willingly undermine Catholic teaching in exchange for power and influence. In the aftermath, Maltese clergy were confused and hurt and the lay faithful felt utterly betrayed. Despite this, Scicluna went on to defend the guidelines, going as far as telling concerned seminarians that if they did not agree with Pope Francis, they were free to leave!
Scicluna went on to contradict Church teaching on homosexuality in the most humiliating way later actually contradicting the Catechism of the Catholic Church in his eagerness to please Pope Francis and was a central contributor to the Pope's utterly cringeworthy Vatican summit on sex abuse.
As the great scholar Fr Hunwicke commented today:
[Scicluna] is on record as having uttered one of the most stark, comprehensive, and pure articulations of the Bergoglianical error:Despite this worrying problems, it is important to state that Mario Grech's appointment was the real outrage, not this Scicluna's who is by far the better man & many would have said this is a good appointment before the dreadful Maltese guidelines were written. Scicluna is very intelligent, and in spite of his flaws, he loves the Church, and has already contributed so much. He has had time to reflect on the "Guidelines" he had a hand in and their effect on the Church. Let us pray for him that if appointed, he puts his great intellect to use for God's work in the service of truth and the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
"Whoever wishes to discover what Jesus wants from him, he must ask the pope, this pope, not the one who came before him, or the one who came before that. This present pope."
I ... and you ... should never pass hasty judgments. But I find it hard to believe that such a person is fit to occupy such a sensitive post.
Just to put things in context, Archbishop Charles Scicluna:
ReplyDelete• Capitulated on contraception,
• Welcomed Islam to Malta
• Supported Amoris Laetitia, and introduced guidelines on Chapter 8
• Contradicted the Church’s teaching on homosexuality
• Contradicted the Catechism of the Catholic Church
• and was a central contributor to the Francis' utterly cringe worthy Vatican summit on sex abuse
And you want us to pray for this new Judas Iscariot of the XXI century, so he may become the new Prefect for the Congregation of the Destruction of the Faith?
I don’t think so.
At this point in time it is irrelevant who would be the new Prefect for the CDF or the new Secretary of State; it doesn’t matter the new apostolic constitution, Praedicate Evangelium for the reform of the Roman Curia neither the newest motu propio Fidem servare.
None of this matters. I think we need to pay attention to point 675 of the current Catechism:
"675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh."
The above aligns perfectly with the vision of Pope Leo XIII, the messages of Fatima and the apparitions of our Lady of La Salette and Akita.
Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio... that is Saint Michael Archangel, defend us in battle.
We have to battle. Accepting Archbishop Charles Scicluna as Prefect of CDF is not engaging in battle.
We should not pray for that.
I think it is our vocation to pray and we have to acknowledge that God's Consequent Will has allowed this situation & we know He can work through any situation, so yes, we should pray!
DeleteOne thing is praying for Archbishop Scicluna; that we should.
DeleteBut another different thing is to pray that he may become the new Prefect of the CDF, on the hope that “if appointed, he puts his great intellect to use for God's work”.
What does Our Lord say?
"He that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in that which is greater: and he that is unjust in that which is little, is unjust also in that which is greater"
Luke 16, 10
I'm certainly not praying he is appointed - why are you manufacturing a polemic where none exists?
DeleteThank God this appointment did NOT happen!!! Libera nos Domine!!! You have no idea who the real Scicluna really is!!! But at least the prayers must have been heard somehow. we understood he lost the train completely for the cardinalate, no chance for becoming the prefect of such a sensitive Dicastery!!
ReplyDelete