De Omnibus Dubitandum Est.

Bishop Thomas Paprocki has described Cardinal Robert McElroy's theology as heretical. Is that accusation justified? In a landmark address to the Outreach Conference with Fr James Martin, Cardinal McElroy presents a vision of mercy, doctrine and human sexuality that many believe represents a decisive departure from Catholic tradition. Rev. Dr Stephen Morgan subjects McElroy's arguments to careful theological scrutiny, drawing on Newman, Benedict XVI and Veritatis Splendor to expose the fault lines in his reasoning and to ask whether what is being proposed is genuine development or something far more radical? Read Morgan's outstanding piece in full at Catholic Unscripted

The quiet dissolution of the Marian Franciscans marks the end of one of the most intriguing and symbolically important traditional Catholic apostolates to emerge in Britain during the pontificate of Pope Francis. The official statements released by the community itself, alongside subsequent statements from the Dioceses of Dunkeld and Portsmouth, are restrained, sorrowful and carefully ecclesial in tone. There are no accusations, no denunciations, no appeals to factional outrage. Instead there is gratitude, obedience, prayer and an unmistakable sense of grief. Yet underneath that restraint lies a profound story about the state of the Church in post Francis Catholicism and the increasingly fractured ecclesial culture which now exists within diocesan life itself. Read my full report here .

Andy Burnham says he lost his Catholic faith because of the Church’s teaching on sexuality. But what if the real issue is not sexuality at all, but a civilisation that no longer understands the human person? My latest article explores the collapse of Christian anthropology in modern Britain: the confusion of love with desire, freedom with autonomy and affirmation with truth. It examines why Catholic teaching on marriage, sexuality and the family cannot simply be dismissed as an outdated “obsession”, but instead rests upon a coherent vision of human nature, reason and moral order stretching from classical philosophy through Christianity itself. At a time when pornography saturates culture, families fragment, birth rates collapse and even the meaning of man and woman is contested, perhaps the Church’s warnings appear less irrational than prophetic. Read the full article here .

  The SSPX crisis cannot be understood through caricature. Many Catholics instinctively recognise the reality of the collapse in catechesis, liturgy and ecclesial confidence which the Society of Saint Pius X has spent decades warning about. That is precisely why this present moment is so dangerous. In my latest article I argue that the deepest problem posed by the SSPX is not that everything they say is false. It is that much of what they say contains enough truth to persuade serious Catholics. But has permanent resistance now begun evolving into something more troubling? Is a movement originally formed to preserve Catholic Tradition gradually drifting toward a parallel ecclesial mentality in which the visible Church herself is increasingly viewed with suspicion? I explore: • the growing crisis of trust in ecclesial authority • the “state of necessity” argument • the dangerous rhetoric now emerging around the consecrations • Donatist parallels and remnant ecclesiology • why the exi...

"The modern world does not need a Church that echoes its confusion back to itself in softer language. It needs a Church confident enough to tell humanity the truth about the human person, about sin, about grace, about sexuality, about marriage, about salvation and about God. And to do that, the Church needs shepherds who believe those truths completely, without embarrassment, without calculation and without ambition." Watch my video about the report on "Hot Button Issues", which the Vatican downgraded to "Emerging Issues":

There is something quietly unsettling about the Road to Emmaus. Not because it is obscure or difficult, but because it is so familiar that we risk missing what is actually happening. Two disciples walk with Christ. They speak with Him. They listen as He opens the Scriptures to them. And yet, we are told, “their eyes were kept from recognising Him.” That line should give us pause. Because the question it raises is not simply historical — it is immediate. If they could walk with Christ and not recognise Him, what does that say about us? We tend to read Emmaus as a story about consolation, about Christ gently restoring faith after disappointment. And it is that. But it is also something far more precise, far more structured. It is, in a sense, a pattern. A revelation not only of who Christ is, but how He chooses to be known. First, through the Scriptures opened and explained. Then, in the breaking of the bread. And only then — in that moment — are their eyes opened. This is not...