De Omnibus Dubitandum Est.

Jeffrey Sachs is an advocate of population control who has been increasingly involved in Vatican policy under Pope Francis. Sachs has dismissed the human rights atrocities against the Uyghurs as “ propaganda ” against the Chinese government but backtracked in 2018, tweeting he was “trying to understand” the situation. According to Yuichiro Kakutani, writing in The Washington Free Beacon last November, Sachs has maintained “a long relationship with the Chinese government and business elite, which can be traced back to at least the early 2000s.” Sachs's economic philosophies have been the subject of both praise and criticism. Nina Munk , author of the 2013 book The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End Poverty , says that, although well intended, poverty eradication projects endorsed by Sachs have years later "left people even worse off than before". This morning the Vatican announced that Sachs had been appointed  an ordinary member of the Pontifical Academy of S...

My friend Ruari McCallion has been keeping tabs on developments in this story. He reports: "He did not say this was a smoking gun, but...“Somebody seems to have loaded it”. UNICEF 'categorically denies' combining contraceptive chemical with tetanus injection; in the immortal words of Mandy Rice-Davies, "They would say that, wouldn't they?". The samples that were finally obtained by the Kenyan doctors are now going to be tested in the UK, which could help to make things a bit clearer. A Dr. Giuseppe Benagiano asserted that WHO does not test anything secretly.Benagiano, a Dean of the faculty of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the University of Rome and former head of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, maintains that “birth control vaccines do not exist”, and that research in this area has persistently failed. Actually, birth control vaccines have been in widespread use for a couple of decades. I wonder if he is aware of them? Here's a...

The scope of the arrogance of western healthcare is truly staggering and only matched by their obsession with population control and enforced western contraceptive ideals on other countries. It took me a while to ditch the attitude that all charities are good, prompted by questions over extravagant advertising campaigns. How much of your pound actually goes to the charity? Then I found out that BBC Children in Need has previously given grants to charities funding abortion and family planning services and using research methods that involve destructive embryos - see the entry in the 2006 edition of SPUC's Charities Bulletin . Information like this made me much more discerning in choosing which charities I support. UNICEF once did a tremendous amount of good, saving lives and improving health. But in 1986, the organisation shifted its emphasis from promoting survival to promoting rights—to the detriment of the children and families involved ( see here ). Now it seems UNIC...