Who will defend the Church?



I had a great weekend, on Saturday meeting up with a bunch of committed Catholic friends for a paintballing session deep in the Surrey woods, and on Sunday after Mass, meeting up with my Catenian brothers for our Christmas lunch.

The men I spent Saturday with are all full of distress about the Church and disappointment regarding the attitude of bishops/ cardinals, the lack of leadership and the fact that consistently, Catholics who believe what the Church teaches, teachers who teach what the Church teaches, and especially priests who teach what the Church teaches are attacked, punished and marginalised, while any kind of heresy is ignored or even promoted.

To be honest I'm swamped with material like this. I feel I have a duty to draw your attention to the dangerous things going on in our Church at present, but on the other hand, I also have a number of positive things I want to report on. I can't find the time to keep up with all the negative stuff, let alone gather my thoughts enough to write something positive and uplifting!

One example is the dreadful nativity scene at the Vatican which everyone seems to be furious about.

Fr. Dwight thinks it's pushing a false theology:
Raymond Arroyo thinks it is just weirdy-beardy (as we used to say when we were kids):
Facebook thinks it is "sexually provocative"
Frank thinks it is sacrilege:
Patrick Madrid thinks the scenes don't belong in a Navity:
Some think it is the nativity of the apocalypse:
Even the Tablet seem gobsmacked:


We are an Incarnational faith. The key difference between Christianity & the other Abrahamic faiths is the utter immanence of God Incarnate as juxtaposed with the utter transcendence of God immutable and distant. The Christian God, the God of Abraham, of Isaac, of Joseph, is "Emmanuel" - that is "God with us". A real historical presence in time and space. But here, as Fr Dwight points out, His Incarnation has somehow been superseded by the more important works of mercy.

Fr. Dwight doesn't mind the nudity and gore on display next to the shepherds and Wise Men (has Epiphany come extremely early in Rome for some reason?). I am not being prudish when I say I do mind, because as many others have pointed out, they just seem completely out of context. Some have also speculated whether they point to a more sinister influence:
This is a reference to the homo-erotic mural commissioned by this Cardinal for his cathedral Church in Terni-Narni-Amelia, depicts homoerotic themes, transgender persons, prostitutes, drug dealers and other material highly inappropriate for a church setting.

On Sunday night then, reading these words really touched a nerve:
I want to root for these guys. I want to defer to them like a good little Catholic soldier, like a member of the laity who has no grace of state and no authority to do anything within the hierarchical structure of the Church. But I’m not wearing the red of a cardinal — a red, which, by the way, is supposed to remind them of their duty to shed their blood for the faith — and it’s hard for me to feel as respectful as I should towards these men when they won’t even, as one commenter I saw put it, shed ink for the cause. If they believe the pope is promulgating heresy, they have a solemn duty to act, even if they think they’ll get the St. John Fisher treatment.
I really identified with this post by Steve Skojec and increasingly I feel it speaks to one of a number of seriously deficiencies in contemporary Catholic life. Men and maleness are just not allowed really, and all the gay imagery, hand-wringing social-justice advocacy, flower-arranging and singing high-pitched hymns only serves to continue to marginalise us. Seems incredibly ironic in what is often depicted as a rigid patriarchal hegemony, but it does explain a lack of vocations and low Mass attendance from men especially (ask any priest, they'll give anecdotal evidence that this is largely the case) and families who lack the essential influence of a faithful Catholic father.

And this is the way all the men I was with yesterday feel. Utterly abandoned by the Church. We believe what the Church teaches and has always taught at great personal cost, but the Church doesn't exist outside our own fraternity and in a few orthodox pockets

So here we are, the lions led by donkeys, desperately hoping they will stand up for us, for the faith they represent, for the Church they serve, all to no avail. All we can do is continue to band together, to pray and hope, and to speak out in the hope that God will send some brave martyr to stand up for His Church. Although I wouldn't be surprised if there was a good bit more purgation required before we start to build things up again from scratch. We need to burn out this infection root and stem.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bishop John Arnold - "A Nasty Little Bully"

Image
Pat Buckley has posted  a letter from a Salford priest giving the low down on what is going on in that diocese. I think it is really important because it is a report from the diocese, but also because if you pay attention to communications from the CCBEW you would think Bishop Arnold is the best bishop in the country! This despite the fact he is clearly seriously at odds with much of the Catholic faith and overly concerned with issues best described as mission creep. He advised the Catenian Association to drop "practicing Catholic" from its statutes and is obsessed with CAFOD and climate change, issues which might seem trendy, but in reality only diminish the Gospel. Arnold is chairman of CAFOD and approved the appointment of the current director who is clearly at odds with Catholic teaching . He also loves an "LGBTQI+ Mass" - more on some of that stuff here . To me he epitomises so many of the bishops: he likes the trappings and power but is very uncomfortable wit
Read more

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

Image
This morning on BBC TV Sunday Morning Live there was a good debate inspired by Melinda Gates (who identifies as Catholic) comments about the pope potentially changing doctrine on contraception. The Catholic contributors were Fr Paddy McCafferty, Clare Short and Obianuju Ekeocha. I think they did really well. Uju's direction is very interesting and easily wrong foots those who want to impose western ideas of morality on Africans in an imperialistic way. Interesting that the presenter agrees with her on this. Fr Paddy gave a great account of his experience as a priest. He was compassionate, realistic and honest, while upholding the value and importance of the doctrine. Clare said she had experience of both ways and the Catholic way is better by far. I thought that was awesome! I especially liked her focus on equality and bringing the responsibility of both husband & wife into the discussion. Watch out for the bit where the other lady says "Pope Francis has ind
Read more