Pope Francis: Indulging in False Oppositions



Last week, Pope Francis made this much reported remark:
“Do I love God or dogmatic formulations?”
We might be tempted to think that the false opposition and sentimentality implicit in the question is characteristic of modern Jesuits. And no doubt it is, of some of them.

However, as the Catholic Scholar ‎Peter Kwasniewski‎ shows in his latest article at LifeSite, Francis's statement sharply contrasts with the views of five major modern Jesuit theologians:

Fr. Pierre Rousselot, S.J. (1878–1915);
Fr. Emile Mersch, S.J. (1890–1940);
Fr. Henri de Lubac, S.J. (1896–1991);
Fr. Piet Fransen, S.J. (1913–1983);
Fr. Avery Dulles, S.J. (1918–2008).
So does this mean that Francis is an outlier even among his own order?

This article contains quotations from all five in which they show why (in the words of one): 
"Take away dogma and you take God away; to touch dogma is to touch God. To sin against dogma is to sin against God."
Pope Francis continues to demonstrate his unsuitability for the role of Supreme Pontiff, Kwasniewski‎ frames this recent comment as part of...
the pope’s regrettable habit of indulging in false oppositions — dogma against love, theory against practice, principles against reality, tradition against progress, and many other pairs — not only is repugnant to the instinct of the faithful and their “supernatural common sense”, but does not even align with the best thinking of modern Jesuits on the absolute value of rational and dogmatic truth and the serious peril of embracing or surrendering to error, which, if major, cuts us off from God and salvation as effectively as moral turpitude or hatred for our neighbor does.
Pope Francis has said he doesn't care about theology - this is evident from his rhetoric. He doesn't seem to like or care for the Church much, especially those who love it. He is far happier engaging in quips and off-the-cuff rhetoric, innuendo, gossip and whispers. I wish I did know what he did care about!


https://scionsupply.com/

Comments

  1. TF18 October 2019 at 12:52

    Answer: power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. TLM18 October 2019 at 13:17

    The man is not a Christian let alone a Catholic Christian. Very obvious for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. PaoloP18 October 2019 at 20:13

    Good to know that this man believes dogmas have no relation to God.
    That's good, because we are aware he can't possibly be a valid pope.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bishop John Arnold - "A Nasty Little Bully"

Image
Pat Buckley has posted  a letter from a Salford priest giving the low down on what is going on in that diocese. I think it is really important because it is a report from the diocese, but also because if you pay attention to communications from the CCBEW you would think Bishop Arnold is the best bishop in the country! This despite the fact he is clearly seriously at odds with much of the Catholic faith and overly concerned with issues best described as mission creep. He advised the Catenian Association to drop "practicing Catholic" from its statutes and is obsessed with CAFOD and climate change, issues which might seem trendy, but in reality only diminish the Gospel. Arnold is chairman of CAFOD and approved the appointment of the current director who is clearly at odds with Catholic teaching . He also loves an "LGBTQI+ Mass" - more on some of that stuff here . To me he epitomises so many of the bishops: he likes the trappings and power but is very uncomfortable wit
Read more

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

Image
This morning on BBC TV Sunday Morning Live there was a good debate inspired by Melinda Gates (who identifies as Catholic) comments about the pope potentially changing doctrine on contraception. The Catholic contributors were Fr Paddy McCafferty, Clare Short and Obianuju Ekeocha. I think they did really well. Uju's direction is very interesting and easily wrong foots those who want to impose western ideas of morality on Africans in an imperialistic way. Interesting that the presenter agrees with her on this. Fr Paddy gave a great account of his experience as a priest. He was compassionate, realistic and honest, while upholding the value and importance of the doctrine. Clare said she had experience of both ways and the Catholic way is better by far. I thought that was awesome! I especially liked her focus on equality and bringing the responsibility of both husband & wife into the discussion. Watch out for the bit where the other lady says "Pope Francis has ind
Read more