The Pope meets Pelosi


The Pope continues to act in increasingly problematic and distressing ways. 

This weekend he met Nancy Pelosi at the Vatican. Pelosi, for my non-American readers, is the 81 year old Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, a role she has held since 2019. The speaker is the political and parliamentary leader of the House of Representatives and is simultaneously the House's presiding officer, de facto leader of the body's majority party, and the institution's administrative head. Speakers also perform various other administrative and procedural functions.

Pelosi, like President Joe Biden, makes much of her "devout" Catholic faith. It's a useful way to curry favour with like-minded voters. Pelosi is an ardent promoter of the LGBT ideology, she supports contraception and, most vocally, promotes abortion claiming it is completely consistent with her claims to be a devout Catholic.

Pelosi voted against the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 and earlier attempts at similar bans, and voted against the criminalization of certain situations where a minor is transported across state lines for an abortion (HR 748, passed).

She has voted in favour of lifting the ban on privately funded abortions at overseas U.S. military facilities (HA 209, rejected); in favour of an amendment that would repeal a provision forbidding servicewomen and dependents from getting an abortion in overseas military hospitals (HA 722, rejected); and in favour of stripping the prohibition of funding for organizations working overseas that use their own funds to provide abortion services, or engage in advocacy related to abortion services (HA 997, rejected). She also voted in favor of the 1998 Abortion Funding Amendment, which would have allowed the use of district funds to promote abortion-related activities, but would have prohibited the use of federal funds.

In 2008, she was rebuked by Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C., for being "incorrect" in comments she made to Tom Brokaw on Meet the Press concerning Church teaching on the subjects of abortion of when a human life begins. The archbishop's statement quoted Pelosi as saying the church has not been able to come with a definition of when life begins. During the interview she said, "over the history of the church, this [what constitutes the moment of conception] is an issue of controversy." In February 2009, Pelosi met with her bishop, Archbishop George Hugh Niederauer of San Francisco, and with Pope Benedict XVI regarding the controversy. 

After the meeting, Pope Benedict released a statement saying he spent fifteen minutes talking to her about the right to life and the need to defend the unborn. No such statement has been released by Pope Francis.

The meeting comes hot on the heels of a huge row in the US between Pelosi and her current Archbishop, Cordileone. The Archbishop launched a prayer campaign last month aimed at inspiring “a conversion of heart” among politicians supporting abortion.

“A conversion of heart of the majority of our Congressional representatives is needed on this issue, beginning with the leader of the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi,” the San Francisco archbishop said. “I am therefore inviting all Catholics to join in a massive and visible campaign of prayer and fasting for Speaker Pelosi: commit to praying one rosary a week and fasting on Fridays for her conversion of heart.”

Cordileone urged Catholics and people of goodwill to sign up for the “Rose and a rosary for Nancy Pelosi” campaign.

Phil Lawler draws attention to the clear message being communicated by the Pope here: 

Even as Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone was urging faithful Catholics to pray for the wayward Speaker, that she might have a “conversion of heart,” a smiling Pope Francis was greeting her at the apostolic palace, giving the world no indication that he is troubled by her outspoken promotion of abortion on demand.
On the plane home from his recent Bratislava trip, the Pope was asked about the situation and made some distressing and confusing comments. He did say that the Catholic Church is firm in its stance on abortion because “abortion is murder,” but, confusingly, he urged priests to be pastoral rather than political when faced with the question of who can receive Communion - a direct contradiction of Canon Law.

Pope Francis said that he had never personally refused the Eucharist to anyone, adding that he was not aware of ever having been in the situation that the journalist who posed the question described: that of a pro-abortion politician coming to him for Communion. So that's clear then.

The Pope also told the story of a time when he inadvertently gave Communion to a Jewish woman at a retirement home who had approached the sacrament in ignorance.

All this simply made me think he has very little regard for the Sacrament. Certainly, given the confusing situation with Biden & Pelosi openly promoting abortion while loudly professing their devotion to the Catholic faith it would make sense for the Pope to give some clear guidance. He just doesn't seem bothered.

So what's his next move? He gets Nancy in for a cosy, smiley chat. Of course, they can't communicate. She doesn't speak Spanish or Italian and he doesn't speak much English...Which just emphasises that this was about optics.

Pelosi has already been told off for her stance by Pope Benedict XVI. Why would she go for further reprimand if she hadn't been assured beforehand that he wasn't going to reprimand her?

Perhaps he did reprimand her and just hasn't spoken out about it. But Pelosi's team are playing this as a papal endorsement (of course), so if he is keeping quiet about telling her off, he is (inadvertently???) showing Catholics that they can support abortion and there are literally zero consequences. He is also undermining Archbishop Cordileone in a horrific way.

The dubia cardinals couldn't get an audience. Cardinal Zen couldn't get an audience. But here's the Pope cosying up with a woman who has facilitated the murder of children up to birth.

When Pope Francis is grumpy with someone, you know it. Just think about his meeting with Donald Trump, the most pro-life President in history:

Lawler also draws attention to the timing of the meeting & recognises that the way this is being used to manipulate the US bishops - quite extraordinary that a politician would collude with the Pope to manipulate his bishops.

The timing of Pelosi’s visit was not accidental. Oh, yes, she was attending a meeting of legislators in Rome. But have you seen any reports from that meeting? Any front-page photos, of the sort she collected at the Vatican? No; her business with the Holy See was more important than the international gathering.

In just a few weeks, the US bishops will meet in Baltimore, to discuss a statement on “Eucharistic coherence.” The most significant question about that statement is how it will handle the problem created by Catholic politicians like Pelosi and President Biden, who continue to claim that their advocacy for abortion can be reconciled with their professed Catholicism. Pelosi’s mission in Rome was to persuade American prelates that they should not take a forthright stand on that question. And let’s face it: the Vatican gave that mission an enormous boost.

Canon Lawyer J.D. Flynn also remarks on the obvious political dimension to the game Pope Francis is playing here. Writing in The Pillar, he states:

"Pelosi’s trip — which included photo ops with Cardinal Peter Turkson and Pope Francis himself — will make difficult the ongoing effort of some bishops to call pro-choice Catholic politicians to conversion on abortion, and to respond with ecclesiastical discipline to Catholic lawmakers set on advancing legal protections for abortion in the U.S."

Flynn finds it difficult to see anything other than a clear and frankly cynical move by the Pope to undermine the efforts of US bishops to uphold Catholic teaching:

"Further, itt [SIC] seems difficult to imagine that Francis was not briefed on Cordileone’s efforts before he met with Pelosi.

Of course, the pope meets with foreign leaders frequently, so it can be believed plausibly that his meeting with the House speaker in the Vatican on Saturday was not an effort to throw water on the bishops’ conference debate.

But the timing is remarkable, to say the least."

All this comes at a time when the Pope is opening the new Synodal way and openly calling for the Church to be "different"

When the Pope is openly calling for the Church to abandon Tradition and embrace the spirit of the age: 

At least one US bishop had the courage to publicly point out that this is quite contrary to the purpose and mission of the Church:

Given that even the most "Francis" of US Bishops - Archbishop Wilton Gregory of  Washington has recently commented that Joe Biden “is not demonstrating Catholic teaching” with his abortion stance, would it be reasonable to speculate that the Pope going behind the bishop's backs and undermining them in this way could likely alienate them further as a body? Is this Machiavellian, Peronist Pope over playing his hand here? Only time will tell, but if, finally, bishops start to wake up and realise that Pope Francis and his strange direction is not any sort of leadership that is friendly to the Catholic faith, it could not come soon enough.



Comments

  1. Christendom Awake14 October 2021 at 09:39

    Are the English Bishops aware that Pope Francis has effectively killed evangelisation, and the he is a de-evangelizing witness. He certainly killed off the New Evangelisation within three years of becoming Pope (by this I mean that everyone's head went down, and workers became demoralised).

    If you want to make a point, then surely the next step is to start pointing out to the Bishops that Pope Francis is effectively killing off evangelization. Ironically, I thought that we were supposed to be moving towards being a missionary Church. I do not believe that this is possible under Pope Francis.

    The message needs to now point out the increasing 'death of evangelisation' because of this Pope.

    ReplyDelete
  2. utahagen14 October 2021 at 23:59

    It is unreasonable to suppose this Pope may have tried to change Nancy Pelosi's mind about abortion. The Vatican tweeted a gushing description of the meeting between the Pope and Pelosi, listing all the issues they discussed. Abortion was not one of them. The Pope looked ECSTATIC when they met and allowed many photos of them together to be taken. Bergoglio endorsed Pelosi and everything she stands for.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bishop John Arnold - "A Nasty Little Bully"

Image
Pat Buckley has posted  a letter from a Salford priest giving the low down on what is going on in that diocese. I think it is really important because it is a report from the diocese, but also because if you pay attention to communications from the CCBEW you would think Bishop Arnold is the best bishop in the country! This despite the fact he is clearly seriously at odds with much of the Catholic faith and overly concerned with issues best described as mission creep. He advised the Catenian Association to drop "practicing Catholic" from its statutes and is obsessed with CAFOD and climate change, issues which might seem trendy, but in reality only diminish the Gospel. Arnold is chairman of CAFOD and approved the appointment of the current director who is clearly at odds with Catholic teaching . He also loves an "LGBTQI+ Mass" - more on some of that stuff here . To me he epitomises so many of the bishops: he likes the trappings and power but is very uncomfortable wit
Read more

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

Image
This morning on BBC TV Sunday Morning Live there was a good debate inspired by Melinda Gates (who identifies as Catholic) comments about the pope potentially changing doctrine on contraception. The Catholic contributors were Fr Paddy McCafferty, Clare Short and Obianuju Ekeocha. I think they did really well. Uju's direction is very interesting and easily wrong foots those who want to impose western ideas of morality on Africans in an imperialistic way. Interesting that the presenter agrees with her on this. Fr Paddy gave a great account of his experience as a priest. He was compassionate, realistic and honest, while upholding the value and importance of the doctrine. Clare said she had experience of both ways and the Catholic way is better by far. I thought that was awesome! I especially liked her focus on equality and bringing the responsibility of both husband & wife into the discussion. Watch out for the bit where the other lady says "Pope Francis has ind
Read more