Why Priests Don't Call the Pope Out

Pretty much every single priest I know thinks Pope Francis is an utter disaster. I am aware of a few who don't think that, or, at least, they don't openly say that he is a disaster. Instead they talk about how wonderful he is and promote him and his globalist objectives (#LaudatoSi and all that). You can easily recognise these priests because they are the ones who are either openly ambitious and place their ambition way above their belief in Christ and the Gospel, or they simply stopped bothering years ago and are trying to push the Church in a different direction, usually a direction which suits their own sin.

The vast, vast majority I know are utterly devastated. They might discuss this with people they know and trust, but why not more openly? Why, if the Pope is so wrong, don't they actually come out and say so?

Well, there's canon law for one thing. Canon 273 states:

Clerics are bound by a special obligation to show reverence and obedience to the Supreme Pontiff and their own ordinary.

So you're pretty stuffed. Even when the pope is as treacherous, manipulative and dishonest as Francis.

The other reason is that Francis is well known to be extremely vindictive. A point which has just been proven again this week as he cancelled an African priest who was so disgusted with the Pope's siding with the pro-aborts immediately after the Roe vs Wade decision was overturned.

The priest's response to the Holy Father is well worth reading:

Abidjan – July 1, 2022

To the Reigning Pontiff
Pope Francis

Dearest Father,

I have just received the Decree of the Congregation for Bishops, signed by you and Cardinal Marc Ouellet, in which you validate the sanctions imposed on me by the Prelature of Opus Dei because, according to the Decree, I lacked “respect and obedience to the Supreme Pontiff” (Code of Canon Law 273). In short, I am forbidden to preach, confess and celebrate Mass in public and private.

I take note of your decision, which I do not approve of because it is unjust. Moreover, I cannot, in conscience, renounce my public criticism of Pope Francis because, since 2016, you yourself have seriously lacked “respect and obedience to God and the People of God”. Indeed, before being pope and bishop, you are a priest and, according to the Code of Canon Law, “in leading their lives, clerics are bound in a special way to pursue holiness since, having been consecrated to God by a new title in the reception of orders, they are dispensers of the mysteries of God in the service of His people” (276). Furthermore, as bishop and pope, you are concerned by the following canons: “an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication” (1364); “a person who in a public show or speech, in published writing, or in other uses of the instruments of social communication utters blasphemy, gravely injures good morals, expresses insults, or excites hatred or contempt against religion or the Church is to be punished with a just penalty” (1369).

O Father, let me tell you that you have failed in your duty of priestly, episcopal and papal sanctity; and that you have propagated heresies and gravely injured good morals. And in your case, more than for a simple priest or bishop, this is even very serious, for the good example of a pope can do much good, while his bad example can do great harm. Please remember the following words of Jesus Christ, Our Lord and Master, True Judge of all men and even of Pope Francis: “Much will be required of the person entrusted with much, and still more will be demanded of the person entrusted with more” (Luke 12:48); “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to fall, it would be better for him if a great millstone were tied around his neck and he were cast into the abyss of the sea... woe to the man through whom the fall comes!”(Matthew 18:6-7). But you have scandalised the whole world several times by contradicting Christian Tradition. Let me now give you the proof...

1. Is it morally right for a Christian, a priest or a bishop to take the initiative to ask for homosexual coexistence laws? God and the Catholic Church have always said ‘no’. Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI have reminded us that every Christian has a “duty to witness to the truth” and to show “absolute personal opposition to such laws”, otherwise he commits “a gravely immoral” act (Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; June 3, 2003). Unfortunately, you have answered ‘yes’. Indeed, on October 21, 2020 and September 15, 2021, you publicly called for the adoption of homosexual civil coexistence laws (cf. my 1st open letter): “What we have to do is a civil coexistence law; they have the right to be covered legally. I defended this.” Let me point out to you, Father, where your error lies: you are confusing “coexistence laws” with “protection laws”. Coexistence laws are related to LGBTQ ideology while protection laws are related to human discrimination. There are protection laws for children, pregnant women, people with disabilities, migrants, prisoners, etc. All of these people are entitled to humane consideration and treatment, but they do not require special homosexual coexistence laws.

2. Is it morally right to give the Sacrament of the Eucharist to publicly pro-abortion politicians who do not renounce abortion? God and the Catholic Church have always answered ‘no’ (cf. Code of Canon Law 915-916). Unfortunately, you have answered ‘yes’. Indeed, on September 15, 2021, you publicly agreed, with the incredible support of Cardinals Ladaria, Peter Turkson, Wilton Gregory, Archbishops Paglia and Michael Jackels, etc. (cf. my 4th open letter). On June 29, 2022, certainly consciously and premeditatedly, you allowed Nancy Pelosi, publicly known for her support of abortion, to receive the Holy Eucharist in the Vatican, during a Mass celebrated by you, and knowing full well that this was publicly forbidden to her by her bishop-resident. Thus, you lead the Catholic Church to disrespect its own laws given in the Code of Canon Law and you disrespect God and the Catholic People.

3. Is it morally right to perform a hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) with the agreement of medical experts but without a medical emergency for the mother’s health? God and the Catholic Church have always said ‘no’. Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI have made it clear that if a group of medical experts confirm to a woman that her future pregnancies will not pose a threat to her health or life, she cannot have her uterus removed with the excuse that her future pregnancies will never come to term (cf. Document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; July 31, 1993). Unfortunately, you and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith have answered ‘yes’. Indeed, on December 10, 2018, together with Cardinal Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, S.J., (Prefect) and Archbishop Giacomo Morandi (Secretary), you opened the door to direct sterilization, the first anti-natalist measure of the Catholic Church and the first error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (cf. my 3rd open letter).

4. Is it morally right to say that “the commitment to live in continence can be proposed” to Christians and is “an option”? God and the Catholic Church have always answered ‘no’. All Catholics with a minimum of orthodox Christian formation (and even non-Christians who strive to live the natural moral law) know that chastity is never an option but a serious moral duty for every human being (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church 2331-2400). Unfortunately, you have answered ‘yes’. Indeed, on September 5, 2016, you and the bishops of the Pastoral Region of Buenos Aires stated that “the commitment to live in continence can be proposed. Amoris laetitia does not ignore the difficulties of this option... the mentioned option may not, in fact, be feasible” Furthermore, on June 5, 2017, you ordered that these three sentences be published as “Magisterium authenticum” (Acta Apostolicae Sedis 108). In 2,000 years of Catholic history, this is the first papal doctrinal-moral error thus recorded in the Vatican Archives (cf. my 2nd open letter), with the astonishing support of several cardinals, bishops and priests: Parolin, Kasper, Schönborn, Coccopalmerio, Vallini, Cupich, Grech, Paglia, Forte, Scicluna, Fenoy, McElroy, Spadaro, Bordeyne, etc.

My sanction this morning makes it clear that you, and [Monsignor] Fernando Ocáriz, and Cardinal Marc Ouellet, still retain a capacity for moral judgment. Why, then, your guilty and scandalous silences in the face of cardinals who gravely lack “respect and obedience to God and the People of God”? Cardinal Hollerich, S.J. (who has said publicly that “the Church’s teaching that homosexuality is sin is false”), Cardinal Marx (who has said publicly that “homosexuality is not a sin”), Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi (who allowed Father Gabriele Davalli to bless a homosexual couple at a Mass on June 11, 2022), Cardinal Blase Cupich (who allowed Father Joe Roccasalva to permit a homosexual couple to give the homily at a Mass on June 19, 2022, Father’s Day), etc.

What sanction for these unfaithful cardinals to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church? None. On the contrary, positions of responsibility and public praise from Pope Francis while priests faithful to Christian Tradition are sanctioned. O Father, what is this unjust justice of Pope Francis and the Vatican? Are you sure that God can accept such injustice? Why today this wind of dictatorship in the Catholic Church against those who prefer to obey the absolute divine law instead of following your flagrant disobedience to this eternal divine law? With all this, do you really think you deserve the respect of Christians, when you lead them to offend God and despise His eternal law?

Finally, the condemnation I received in this morning’s Decree is unjust because it does not take into account the following words of Jesus Christ (which, I say with respect, it would be good for you and [Monsignor] Ocáriz and Cardinal Ouellet to meditate on calmly): “Why do you notice the splinter in your brother’s eye, but do not perceive the wooden beam in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove that splinter from your eye,’ while the wooden beam is in your eye? You hypocrite, remove the wooden beam from your eye first; then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother’s eye.” (Matthew 7:3-5) What are my errors (splinter) compared to the errors of Pope Francis (wooden beam)? I hope that Catholic intellectuals will have the courage to defend this truth, for love of Jesus and his Church.

What is the greatest crime of the African priest now sanctioned? To have had the audacity to contradict in public Pope Francis and his Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. However, didn’t Jesus (30 years old) do the same with the religious leaders of his time (60, 70, 80 years old) because he was the one in the truth? Unfortunately, they handed him over to be crucified. Yet, it was from this sacrifice that God derived his victory: the light of Truth shone on the darkness of error and lies. Dearest Father, I take refuge in the open side of Jesus Crucified and in the tears of the Virgin Mary at the foot of the Cross...

Your son in Jesus, Mary and Joseph,
Abbé Janvier Gbénou
(pen name: Father Jesusmary Missigbètò)

Personally, I am far from surprised that Abbé Janvier Gbénou is so scandalised and frustrated that he felt he had to speak out irrespective of the consequences. The grave scandal that Pope Francis is giving to the whole world is utterly reprehensible and desperately needs to be to called out.

The fact that, after the greatest prolife victory of our generation, his sole response was to welcome one of the greatest opponents to that victory, a woman who has been openly opposing Church teaching on abortion, contraception, IVF - you name it - whilst flouting her "devout Catholic" credentials, a woman who has been censured by her own Archbishop, and then, in contradiction to her own Archbishop's ruling, allow her to receive Holy Communion at a Papal Mass at St. Peter's??! What greater blasphemy could a Pope engage it? What greater mockery of our Lord? Of the Sacraments?

And indeed, a growing number of people are calling him out for the apostate that he is:


  1. Abbé Janvier Gbénou is a saint who is not afraid of calling out the False Prophet in the Vatican for his hideous & blasphemous overturning of Christ's teachings, smearing the sanctity of His Bride the OHCA Church & publicly carrying out the work of Satan & his minions on an hourly basis while the whole world looks on astonished by the indifference of the Curia which has, over the past 9 years, been stuffed by non-Catholic infiltrators who are poised to complete the task given by St. Gallen Group (Mafia) of completely rendering the Catholic Church infertile & unable to carry out its mission of spreading the gospel to the entire world as Our Lord intended. It is the duty of the few to call for an immediate imperfect council in order to pujblicly denounce Francis & his
    cabal & this time install the choice of Heaven on the Seat of Peter as Our Lady alluded to in Quito.

    1. Many saints were exiled and even excommunicated for speaking the truth which must be said. This priest did it respectfully. The false church and the anti-pope cause scandals continuously and the little ones are lost to the faith.

  2. One loses hope sometimes that priests (not actors and/or cowards) are still out there. While I understand the need to be wise as a serpent, nothing good be accomplished at this time by being on the side of those (allegedly in obedience) who are openly rejecting Christ and His Church. Any sane Catholic, no matter how theologically naive, can see that obedience to Christ comes first. Thank You for posting this.

  3. "What greater blasphemy could a Pope engage it? What greater mockery of our Lord? Of the Sacraments?"

    Francis doesn't believe. "A little bread and wine 'does no harm,' Pope Francis said to a divorced woman as he flew in the face of Catholic convention by telling her it's okay to take communion." Seems like a direct denial of the Real Presence to me. This was in 2014. He made similar heretical statements when he was in Argentina. So the real question has ALWAYS been, can an open heretic be "elected" Pope? I say no.

    John F. Kennedy
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    1. Sorry. I just realized that YOU were the person on Twitter that reposted that 2014 Mail Online article. It is frustrating that almost no one I know really understands what he is doing. ESe keep up the good work of exposing evil. Thanks!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pope Francis: we planned it all before the conclave

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

A Cardinal writes: “Roma loquitur. Confusio augetur.”