The Ancient Rite of the Mass cannot be Forbidden

“๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด; ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด; ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜บ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ณ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ, ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ; ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด. ๐˜‰๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต'๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ถ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ.
๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต “๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ” ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ “๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด,” ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ต. ๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ, ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต. ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ. ๐˜๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ.”

๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต, ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ “๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ & ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†”, ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€, ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐˜† ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ, ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿญ.

see: https://www.firstthings.com/web.../2021/07/mass-and-memory

The bitter irony of the Catholic Church today is that the Pope who suppresses the Mass of the Saints, claiming that the reformed liturgy is “the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite” (Traditiones custodes, Art. 1) simultaneously promulgates a new "Mayan" rite of the Mass:
 

While academics argue about the implications of the Pope's words and actions, they appear continually perplexed by his lack of consistency and clarity. If you want to know how bad it is, it would be hard to find a better expression than the reactions of Cardinal Raymond Burke former prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and Cardinal Gerhard Mรผller former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Both appeared on EWTN's flagship news programme, The World Over Live, hosted by Raymond Arroyo and both appear simply perplexed by what is going on in the Church. There is no way to explain the contradictory and confusing actions we see throughout the Catholic Church at the moment and it is even harder to understand those who are going along with it!


At stake in all this is Catholic credibility. If the Pope refuses to enforce the lex vivendi in Germany, saying that it is up to individual bishops how they proceed with strategies which stand in direct contrast with two thousand years of Christian doctrine, thought and Tradition, while suppressing that Tradition and condemning it whenever he can, how can the Church claim to be anything more than an institution guided by nothing more than personal whim and political machinations?

It is hard to argue that the Pope is doing something other than replacing Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium, with constantly changing beliefs and teachings, a project which he is calling "synodality": "Pope Francis seeks a synodal church that is always reforming". What is most clear is that no one is clear about what any of this means.

What I don't understand is how anyone thinks any of this can be convincing to anyone? The only ones who seem interested (to the point of infatuation) are those who are being flown around the world in business class, sipping Prosecco in business lounges and giving speeches. They all belong to the same demographic and lecture us about accompaniment, diversity and dialogue while closing down anyone who disagrees.

For years I have been saying that the greatest stumbling block to the preaching of the Kingdom and the message of the Gospel today is hierarchs and prelates who are determined that you are Catholic enough to give plenty of cash to keep them in the manner to which they have become accustomed, but not so Catholic that you care, that you recognise when they want to do something that contradicts the faith or cause a fuss or challenge the prevailing culture or embarrass them in any way.

I suppose it has ever been this way, but I do wonder if, in backing Francis, they may just have pushed the business model too far?

A house divided cannot stand (Mt 12:22-28) and, contrary to his role as the great bridge builder - the point of unity for all Christians, Pope Francis continues to factionalise the Catholic Church and pursue ideologically controversial positions which can only possibly divide the bride of Christ even further. It is an incremental heresy which chokes orthodox teaching and practice and allows error to slip through, drip by drip, piece by piece.

 

Comments

  1. Notably, their true orientation and vocation is ever before our eye. Let us talk about, they say, Sex. Their thoughts feelings desires activities are sexual, recognisable to any human being older than a dozen years. Academia devotes much study to the various strands of sex. Rooms-full of young people study sex in various courses, certified with diploma by the Professor Dean Chancellor. Also now broadened and lecherously enfolding our infant children, offering alumni more career paths.
    For brevity, extrapolate through our society - copy and paste, varying only in intensity.
    Such being the case, the delight of talking about, even singing and chanting about/to God etc etc for which we congregate together is being pushed out, and replaced with yet more sex.
    They must put aside their personal cares and works. Their roster is muddled leading to awkward mistakes. Our murderers, rapists, thieves, adulterers, whore mongers, the envious, gluttonous, pimps, harlots, conjurers and occasional good man/woman, know to leave their various personal pastimes at the church door.
    Somebody with authority must disabuse the voluptuaries with knitted brow, dispel their confusion and clarify the basic requirements of participation. lol. It is better for them and better for the others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

Cardinals Revolt Against Pope Francis DDF Appointment

Father Bux: ‘There Is Turmoil in the College of Cardinals’