Cardinal Gregory: Causing Offence to Catholics with Same Sex Attraction

 

On April 4, 2019, Pope Francis named Wilton Gregory as archbishop of the Archdiocese of Washington. On October 25, 2020, Pope Francis announced he would raise Gregory to the rank of cardinal at the consistory of November 28, 2020.

On July 22, 2022, Gregory promulgated liturgical norms in accordance with Traditiones custodes. His swift restriction of the Traditional Latin Mass stands in strict contrast to his lackadaisical enforcement of canonical norms regarding the liturgy, as Taylor Marshall notes above. 

Gregory has also been a key figure in undermining the ruling by Archbishop Cordileone that Nancy Pelosi should not be admitted to Holy Communion, given her aggressive and unrepentant stance on abortion. Similarly, Gregory has been pivotal in facilitating President Joe Biden's blatant sacrilege in this respect. That has led us to a position where we have a President who claims to be a devout Catholic while ardently contradicting some of the most basic principles of Catholic teaching on a regular basis, causing great scandal and confusion for Catholics. Fundamentally, Gregory is doing incredible damage to the faith by allowing a situation where every Catholic can wonder if the President can do it, why can't everyone else?
While one may possibly understand the Cardinal's attitude to homosexuality as pastoral, in the model of Pope Francis, what seems to be constantly ignored is a two fold dilemma created by this approach.
1. It directly contradicts the consistent teaching of the Church in this regard, summed up beautifully in this Vatican teaching document from the CDF and more recently (yes, under Pope Francis) dealt with in this Vatican teaching document which deals more specifically with the pernicious lie of "gender theory".
2. It is most offensive to faithful Catholics with same-sex attraction who deal with this on a daily basis and have done for many years: Those who, despite everything society tells them, have found that there is more to their identity as a human being than their sexuality.

This was beautifully expressed by a lady with same-sex attraction over the weekend. She posted her email to Cardinal Gregory on Twitter. I have copied the text here and embedded her tweet. It seems to me that it is vital we listen to her voice.

Here is the email I just sent to Cardinal Gregory: Your Eminence, My name is Anna Katherine Howell, but most people call me Anna-Kate. I am 31 years old and a graduate student seeking a Master of Arts in Theology. I am a convert to the Faith and one who takes very seriously the call to live by the teachings of Holy Mother Church, who accepted me, a wretched sinner, as her adopted daughter. I also happen to have same-sex attraction. I have had it for as long as I can remember; whether I was born with it or acquired it when I was too young to remember, I cannot say. From my teen years up until my conversion, I lived a horribly sinful life, including a great deal of promiscuity, an addiction to pornography, and a same-sex "marriage" at age 26. I am not proud of any of this, nor do I celebrate it. What I celebrate is my repentance, conversion, and sincere amendment of life through the grace of Our Lord, which never fails, even when I do. By that very grace, I am living a chaste and holy life as the Church very clearly identifies (see CCC 2359) as my calling. I understand that, when the Church involves itself in such things as Pride events, the intention is good. After all, the paragraph in the catechism which directly precedes the one I cited just a moment ago calls Catholics to treat persons such as me with "respect, compassion, and sensitivity." I believe this is truly the intent of most Catholics. However, when the Church is visibly present at or even sponsors such events, the effect on faithful same-sex attracted Catholics is just the opposite. We are not "LGBTQ." Our attraction is a thing we experience, not an identity we are defined by. The majority of faithful Catholics with same-sex attraction I have talked to prefer to say that we have or we experience same-sex attraction, rather than that we are gays, lesbians, or bisexuals. It is the Father of Lies, the Accuser, who insists on calling us by our sins. Our loving Father in Heaven calls us by our names. We do not want to be identified by our disordered impulses or celebrate our past sins. This is what Pride does. Nor do we want others outside the Church to believe that we celebrate those impulses or sins in others. When the Church is involved in Pride, scandal is unavoidable. People will be confused or misled about what we teach and believe in a time when it has never been more important to be clear about what we teach and believe. Perhaps some within the Church even intend to create and weaponize this ambiguity. We cannot allow that. You may say, "But participation in Pride doesn't mean that we agree with every person, every float, or every message we are marching alongside." True, but I could say the same thing about a Catholic who gives large sums of money to Planned Parenthood: perhaps he or she does not agree with every procedure they perform. That is no less ridiculous than making the same excuse for a visible Catholic presence at a Pride event, let alone holding one on Church grounds. Your Eminence, it is my desire as a Catholic to assume the best of every person I encounter. In that spirit of charity, I choose to believe that you are not someone who wishes to create confusion, scandalize believers and nonbelievers alike, or harm the witness of the Church to persons with same-sex attraction. I believe that it is your desire to accompany persons like me with respect and sensitivity, never forgetting that we are human beings imbued by Almighty God with dignity that transcends any disordered dispositions from which we might suffer. It is because I believe these things to be true of you that I am asking you with all my heart as your sister in Christ to please put a stop to the Pride Mass that is scheduled for 5:30 PM this coming Wednesday (the 14th) at Holy Trinity Church in DC. It will do no good and a great deal of harm for this event to occur. Thank you so much for your time. May God bless you and your ministry richly. In Christ, Anna-Kate Howell

When one considers that the justification Pope Francis has given for his edict to wipe out the Traditional Latin Mass was that it was used in an ideological way. One must then wonder why he doesn’t crackdown on the ideological use of the Mass of Paul VI?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bishop John Arnold - "A Nasty Little Bully"

Image
Pat Buckley has posted  a letter from a Salford priest giving the low down on what is going on in that diocese. I think it is really important because it is a report from the diocese, but also because if you pay attention to communications from the CCBEW you would think Bishop Arnold is the best bishop in the country! This despite the fact he is clearly seriously at odds with much of the Catholic faith and overly concerned with issues best described as mission creep. He advised the Catenian Association to drop "practicing Catholic" from its statutes and is obsessed with CAFOD and climate change, issues which might seem trendy, but in reality only diminish the Gospel. Arnold is chairman of CAFOD and approved the appointment of the current director who is clearly at odds with Catholic teaching . He also loves an "LGBTQI+ Mass" - more on some of that stuff here . To me he epitomises so many of the bishops: he likes the trappings and power but is very uncomfortable wit
Read more

Real Life Catholics on BBC TV defend Church Teaching on Contraception.

Image
This morning on BBC TV Sunday Morning Live there was a good debate inspired by Melinda Gates (who identifies as Catholic) comments about the pope potentially changing doctrine on contraception. The Catholic contributors were Fr Paddy McCafferty, Clare Short and Obianuju Ekeocha. I think they did really well. Uju's direction is very interesting and easily wrong foots those who want to impose western ideas of morality on Africans in an imperialistic way. Interesting that the presenter agrees with her on this. Fr Paddy gave a great account of his experience as a priest. He was compassionate, realistic and honest, while upholding the value and importance of the doctrine. Clare said she had experience of both ways and the Catholic way is better by far. I thought that was awesome! I especially liked her focus on equality and bringing the responsibility of both husband & wife into the discussion. Watch out for the bit where the other lady says "Pope Francis has ind
Read more